Beyond this week's texts, check out my "God Became Small: Preaching Advent" blog with thoughts on how to preach this peculiar season, with loads of illustrative material; and also, looking toward Saturday and Sunday of this week, the same sort of thing on "Preaching Christmas."
Isaiah 7:10-16. I wish I could time-travel back to chat with Matthew and others in that circle of the very first Christian Bible scholar-theologians and listen to them explain their affection for today’s Old Testament text. I can go back in my memory to my Religion 101 class. My deeply religious friend got apoplectic when the professor tried to explain that the Hebrew here (ha-almah) wasn’t “a virgin” but “the young woman.” Why do people cling so fiercely to the notion that prophecies are predictive? The text is far richer than any image of Isaiah gazing into the divine crystal ball and foretelling what would happen in 700+ years. What help would that have been to Ahaz or the Israelites anyhow? They were under extreme duress, with hard decisions looming.
The glory of Isaiah 7:10-16, which doesn’t
detract from Mary and Jesus, but actually adds a profound, unexpected, even
political dimension? Pressured by the Assyrian juggernaut, Ahaz is flailing
about, suspecting a treaty might help, but might not. But to do nothing? –
which is Isaiah’s counsel, or at least that’s what “Trust God!” had to feel
like.
God curiously urges Ahaz to ask for a sign. Our people are fond of signs (usually in place of diligent Bible reflection, spiritual formation, Christian conversation and prayer!) – leading them into what Bruce Waltke (Finding the Will of God: A Pagan Notion?) called “the Hunch method.” The dream house I’ve driven by every day for years has a For Sale sign! It’s a sign from God we should buy it! A hunch, baptized. People never see a poor person with three poorly clothed children crossing the road and think Hmm, it’s a sign: God wants us to adopt an impoverished immigrant family.
My comic mind flits to The Life of Brian, where the crazy crowd pleads for a sign. It’s his shoe he dropped. It’s the juniper berries; a woman asks for another sign and gets upbraided, “Do not tempt him, shallow one, isn’t the miracle of the juniper bushes enough?”
Ahaz, wrapped in a cloak of temporary piety, refrains: “No, I will not put the Lord to the test.”
I love Martin Luther’s view on this: “Impious Ahaz simulates a holy attitude… Thus hypocrites, when it is not necessary, are most religious; but when they ought to be humble, they are most haughty.” Ahaz may have rightly suspected that the sign to be given would not suit his power-grubbing, politically-advantageous fantasies. Your people likely feel weary of the bickering and inanity they see among politicians. Share with them Isaiah’s ding of Ahaz: “It is too little for you to weary mortals, that you weary my God also?” You’re weary of politics? Think how exhausted God must be! The
unasked for sign is the last thing Ahaz wanted: “The young woman” – in
Hebrew, ha-almah – will
have a child. Which “the” woman? One standing nearby? Isaiah’s wife? Isaiah
must have exasperated Mrs. Isaiah by his choice of baby names, like
Mahershalalhashbaz, Shearyashuv, their names being prophecies. Another made-up,
prophetic name is announced for this child: Immanuel, familiar to us now but a
bizarre one back then – meaning, as we know, “God with us.” Ahaz wanted more,
like a legion or thicker walls around Jerusalem. Instead, the infant-sized
promise that God is with us. This is the heart of Advent and Christmas – and
the whole Gospel.
Sam Wells wisely has shown us that the most important word in the Bible, and in all of theology, is with. God is with us – which is way better than a dazzling fortune-telling of what will happen centuries from now. God is as with us as this child is with its mother right now. God is with – not the magical fixer or divine insulator, but just with us, always. This then informs how we do ministry: we don’t fix people, we aren’t charitable toward people, and we certainly don’t pity them; we are with them. If you’ve not yet, read A Nazareth Manifesto. Best theology book in a decade.
Romans
1:1-7. It would take some derring-do to preach on the prologue to Romans on
Advent 4!
And yet, Jesus
shows up, and apostles happen! And “obedience of faith” – what a phrase!! Right
out of the chute, Paul declares it’s “among all the Gentiles” – oh my! He’s
writing to “all God’s beloved in Rome” – of all places! The epicenter of the
corrupt, lost world Jesus invaded and came to rescue.
This Gospel was “promised beforehand.” Just as with Isaiah, it’s not that the Gospel was predicted long ago. God’s eternal plan, God’s constant manner of being, God’s own heart, always laboring, always loving, culminating in the Jesus moment – not a backup plan, not a last ditch effort, but God’s holy intention from the commencement of creation itself. Michelangelo’s creation of Adam depicts God with a woman and child tucked under his left arm – a visual of God’s eternal, beforehand promise and way.
Notice
the words we’d find in a theological dictionary, all piled on top of one
another, as Paul tries to explicate the revolution that Jesus touched off:
servant, called, sent, set apart, good news, holiness, grace, obedience of
faith. All this “by a spirit of holiness” – the same one that came upon Mary!
He probably anticipated that his listeners, once the letter was wrapped up,
delivered, and finally read aloud in Rome, were people of low social standing.
So he speaks to them of being “slaves” – maybe a step down for many of them! –
with no rights, no standing, and yet with the ultimate standing, the freedom
and nobility of being God’s family!
Paul’s allusions to the Shema and various Psalms remind us that in
the days leading up to Jesus’ birth, Mary and Joseph were still devout Jews (as
they would be after the birth too!), doing things like reciting the Shema, and singing Psalms. Jesus, in utero, would have heard his mother’s
voice doing so, muffled a bit, but rejoicing his infant heart.
Matthew 1:18-25. A text so familiar: better to be the docent pointing to its wonder than to try to explain it or make it relevant or devise some moral takeaway. To me, three little things here are noteworthy, if I’m the docent pointing to the wonder. The angels anticipates their fear. Yes, Mary and Joseph had good cause to fear, as do we, always. And yet Scott Bader-Saye’s wisdom comes to mind. Noting how, in our post-9/11 culture, security is everything, and so we wind up living timid lives: “Instead of being courageous, we are content to be safe… We fear excessively when we allow the avoidance of evil to trump the pursuit of the good… Our overwhelming fears need, themselves, to be overwhelmed by bigger and better things.” Joseph and Mary’s fears certainly were.
Joseph astounds. The text speaks of him as “righteous,” caring tenderly enough for her to avoid shaming and ostracizing her. Joseph is a quiet example of mercy. He’s just quiet. In the pageants, he doesn’t get many or any lines. He just stands there, holding the donkey reins, gazing at mother and child. I want to be like him, just close to them, watching, watchful, grateful.
Matthew reminds us of the child with the prophetic name at Isaiah’s court, Immanuel, God with us – and then clarifies how this nickname jives marvelous with the proper name to be given to this child: Jesus, yeshu‘a, which means either “Lord, help!” or “the Lord saves” – or both. Madeleine L’Engle said Jesus’ first cry sounded like the ringing of a bell. Jesus is one with the cry of all humanity. And Jesus is the divine reply to the cry of all humanity, in his cry, in his being Immanuel.
*****
My best exploration of the birth/coming of Jesus theologically, and personally, is in Birth: The Mystery of Being Born (in the Pastoring for Life series) - with an extensive (for me!) exploration of Mary's experience, Jesus' birth, and his very first days on earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.