I think I’ll preach the Old Testament – but first let me flirt a bit with the Epistle and Gospel, which have their thoughtful moments.
Romans 10:5-15. "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!" My surgically repaired foot is ugly as sin. Of course, Paul is seeing the beauty in the proclaimer, who's been sent, actually going, walking, getting to the people to share.
Michael Gorman calls the string of scriptural citations here “somewhat confusing.” Verse 9 gets isolated: “If you just confess with your lips that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved,” as if that’s a formula for a revival. Paul is leaning in to his Jewish relatives and friends who just don’t buy into Jesus. Complicates things – and then do we really want to name that anyone who utters “Jesus is Lord,” and intellectually accepts that Jesus was raised are saved? – and that’s it?
What
about the woman I counseled with who swore to me she’d never believe in Jesus
because her daddy, who most certainly did as a Bible teacher and deacon in his
church, sexually abused her through her teenage years? He’s saved and she
isn’t? Or those who have only heard about Jesus from boring, vapid, judgmental
people? They’re not saved but the dullards are? I don’t think it’s a problem to
ask such questions in the pulpit. No need to answer them. Just let them linger.
Matthew 14:22-33. A tough text unless you do the You have to get out of the boat to walk on water thing. My skeptical head just spins over such a story, that feels more parable than fact – although who knows? I prefer realities – like the sensational archaeological discovery of “the Jesus boat,” a real fishing boat dating to the time of Jesus, a boat he most assuredly saw and maybe stepped into, helps me feel my way into the reality of first century life on Galilee.
Did this Jesus walk on water? And Peter too,
acting very Bruce Almighty-like? – but only briefly. Peter, whose name means
“rock,” sank like a stone. As we would expect. And Jesus fusses at him! Seems
like he should give him credit for taking even a few steps – on water.
There’s
a Buddhist story of a disciple who walked on water, or sank depending on whether
he focused on the Buddha. Easy story to spiritualize. We can even sing
“Precious Lord, take my hand.” But I’m probably not the only guy in the room
who will just shrug and say Gosh, not
sure this really happened. The Gospel writers had to know skeptics as well.
Maybe one or two were themselves skeptics. But they let the story stand – maybe
to throw cold water on skeptics like me and invite me to suspend me for a few
minutes and tread onto such a story that, if it happened or not, most clearly
is about faith, and really about how utterly amazing and God-like Jesus really
was and is.
Genesis
37:1-4, 12-28 appeals to me, as the idea of preaching through the
narrative of Joseph (Gen. 37-50) is something I want to do some day. The
lectionary, though, skips immediately to chapter 45 next week and then plunges
ahead into Exodus. Maybe a sermon can capture the flow of the larger story – without
the sermon being a mere retelling of that story.
And
what a story! The drama, emotion, irony and vivid settings make this the
Bible’s single greatest tale. The climax in chapter 45 (or is it in 50 after
Jacob dies?) is stunning, undermining all our theological oversimplification.
Joseph doesn’t let the brothers off, or give them another chance. He sees in
how God, without causing evil, uses it for good – and the preacher dare not
over-trivialize that thought either. Perilous but precious stuff.
Just
on chapter 37: Joseph, if we’re reading the Hebrew correctly, doesn’t get a
“technicolor dreamcoat” (a la Andrew Lloyd Webber!) but rather a coat with long
sleeves. Short sleeves were essential for day laborers in the fields, where it
would be hot and brambles would get caught in longer sleeves. So Jacob is
saying Joseph gets to live in the comfort and authority of the house, while the
older brothers bear the sweat of hard work out of doors. As happens in the case
of Cain and Abel, brother rages against brother, when brother’s real problem is
with the Father (or God).
Fascinating that, within a single family, we have class division. I wonder if, in my sermon, I might help people think about dashed dreams (especially during this coronavirus season?) - but not just for us but for the marginalized? I may have a soprano sing "I Dreamed a Dream" (from Les Miserables) - and try to ruminate on crushed dreams among us and others. I also noted, watching John Lewis's funeral, that James Lawson quoted Langston Hughes's great dream poem: "I dream a world where man / No other man will scorn, where love will bless the earth / and peace its paths adorn / I dream a world where all / will know sweet freedom's way, where greed no longer saps the soul / nor avarice blights our day. A world I dream where black or white, whatever race you be, will share the bounties of the earth / and every man is free, where wretchedness will hang its head / and joy, like a pearl, attends the needs of all mankind / Of such I dream, my world!" It's not a stretch! Joseph's dream, at the end of the day, was about securing enough for everybody, food for the entire world.
Jonathan Sacks notices how Reuben fairly quickly tries to intervene, but fails – calling him “the Hamlet of Genesis,” someone with good intentions he never completes, or they backfire; at the critical moment, he never comes through.
We
have little hints in this opening scene of the story of how God superintends
things. God is, as Sacks puts it, “already monitoring the sequence of events,
arranging the necessary strategic interventions to ensure that the outcome will
be as planned.” All this is concealed, not obvious at all – and so I wonder how
the preacher opens up to listeners the idea that we are sort of “co-authors of
our lives,” free to act, yet with God’s involvement, a far cry from the silly
“God is in control” mantra people love.
I love it that the Bible seems utterly lacking in sweet, happy families. So much dysfunction – helpful to me, as a guy from an utterly dysfunctional family. Tolstoy’s opening to Anna Karenina is poignant: “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” It’s a bit tongue in check. Every family has its unhappiness. A pastoral challenge is to help people not to glibly say such saccharine things about family. During the Covid-19 crisis, how many people said “Oh, how cool to get more time with family!” – in earshot of the woman whose belittling husband now stays home instead of giving her the respite of leaving for work, or the divorcee who felt her loneliness more agonizingly. Don’t do this in preaching, ever! – and help people to learn how to talk with one another about family. Bible families oddly enough show us the way.
****
Let me refer you to my Festival of Homiletics lecture, "Hope as Arsenic," on when we offer to much, or not enough, or the wrong kind of hope. Very important for us who preach!!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.