Thursday, January 1, 2026

What can we say Feb. 15? Transfiguration Sunday


 As we head into Lent, I thought I'd commend to you a fabulous book of Lenten sermons (beginning with Transfiguration Sunday!), Being Transfigured, by Chris E.W. Green, a sparkling theologian I admire immensely. 

    Exodus 24:12-18. Why does my mind drift to the Busch beer ad from the 80’s, revived for the 2022 Super Bowl: “Head for the mountains.” God invites Moses to come up “on” the mountain; but then Exodus 24 says they went up “into” the mountain. The Hebrew isn’t all that significant. But I wonder. We think of going “on” a mountain. But this mountain? It’s a deeper experience. You go “into” the mountain.

   Such mountainous heights remind me of something I wrote in my book on hymns (Unrevealed Until Its Season). “Roger Scruton, philosopher of beauty, contrasts the serene beauty of a green meadow with a ‘wind-blown mountain crag… We experience the vastness, the power, the threatening majesty of the natural world, and feel our own littleness in the face of it.’ This we call ‘sublime,’ which isn’t super-beautiful, but a beauty that humbles, even frightens you a little. It’s thrilling and inspiring, but it underlines your finitude, your frailty.”

   Isn’t God like such a sublime mountain crag? We are in awe. We tremble a little, and wonder if it’s safe. You can’t just jog to the top. You feel small, and yet drawn into the wonder. How perfect that so many mountain scenes figure prominently in God’s revealing God’s mind and grandeur to us.

   Notice there are 6 days of waiting in a cloud before the Lord spoke! Time. Sabbath timing. Such is Moses’ experience – and his on behalf of all Israel, and of us all.

   2 Peter 1:16-21. The apology here, “We did not follow cleverly devised myths” – which is what the Transfiguration sounds like! The claim from whoever wrote this epistle, not sounding late so much as the word of one of Jesus’ real disciples: “We had been eyewitnesses of his majesty.” Richard Bauckham’s extensive study of the Gospels indicates we have good cause to think of them as based on actual eyewitness accounts – which is a big deal, echoed in today’s text!

   Jesus, in this eyewitness account, “was honored by God the Father” with the voice from heaven: “This is my Son, my Beloved,” a declamation God offered not once but twice: at the Baptism of our Lord, and at his Transfiguration. We are told, at such magical, pivotal, transformative moments, not merely to admire Jesus, but to “listen to him,” to be attentive to him as to a lamp shining in a dark place (Psalm 119:105).

   Matthew 17:1-9 is an endlessly great and generative text for preachers – but not if we have some moral take-away or point. In The Beauty of the Word, I suggest that preaching shouldn’t be so much about us, our faith, our life as disciples, but about God. The Transfiguration is the parade text: the Bible, and thus sermons, should be first of all about God, not us! The takeaway? This threesome are so overwhelmed by God’s unmitigated presence that their respond is simply “They fell to the ground in awe.” Period. I want to preach the sermon that causes my people to be in awe of God. Period.

  So speaking of awe: I just finished Dacher Keltner's remarkable Awe! This deep dive into 
what Awe is – via storytelling and science - is fabulous. “Awe is the emotion we experience when we encounter vast mysteries that we don’t understand.” “Awe reveals that our current knowledge is not up to the task of making sense of what we have encountered.” Lucky us, because “we can find awe anywhere.” This “need for awe is wired into our brains and bodies, and finding awe is easy if we just wonder.” 

   He distinguishes “eight wonders of life.” Before romping through all 8, I wondered which Jesus' transfiguration fit. I suspect it's all 8! Best, maybe, is “other people’s courage, kindness, strength, or overcoming obstacles” – or “moral beauty." Examples abound, from escaping Auschwitz to firemen on 9/11 to Desmond Tutu; think Fr. Greg Boyle or Special Olympics. Then there is “collective effervescence,” like weddings, sports celebrations, reunions, joining in a “wave” – all involving other people. Of course, there is “nature,” from cataclysmic events like a thunderstorm or a tsunami, or the ocean or mushrooms in a forest, or a double rainbow. Then music – which taps something subterranean and inexplicable. Visual design is another wonder: buildings, a Mayan pyramid, a dam, a carved angel, the crafted, crafting and crafter all amazing. Spiritual awe happens, a moving service or an encounter with the numinous. Life and death: so birth, and being at the bedside when your mother dies. And finally epiphanies, sudden moments when we understand essential truths about life. 

   Sometimes it’s a realization, like the moment that dawned on Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward that “Oh my god, this president is going to be impeached.” Or the moment when someone's true self emerges in a crisis or grief. I love it in John Irving’s A Prayer for Owen Meany when Owen responds to key moments with THE SHIVERS. Awe gives you goosebumps, chills, or you shudder; it takes your breath away, and you can’t summon the words to tell about it will, although you wish you did. Maybe you emit a “Whoa” or “Oh my.”

   Keltner points out that in gathering stories of awe from people of 26 cultures around the world, not one mentioned money, Facebook, a smartphone or consumer purchases. Studies show people with less wealth feel awe more frequently. Also, medically, awe evokes humility and joy – but also “regions of the brain that are associated with excesses of the ego, self-criticism, anxiety and depression, quiet down” when we experience awe. As we cultivate and find awe, we become more open to new ideas, more curious, and attentive to the strengths of other people. 

   In preaching, I wonder about the suggestion that any time anybody feels awe, they get a glimpse of what the disciples saw in the Transfiguration. It's a reach - but using the text to cultivate the habit of looking for everyday awe? Okay, enough Keltner for now!

   Some other items worth pondering in our text for today: it was “6 days later,” just as our Old Testament text, Exodus 24, did not jumpstart until six days, waiting for the Sabbath, had passed. The 6 days here are also after the Caesarea Philippi conversation on Who Jesus is, and why he matters, all that gloomy talk about Jesus suffering, taking up your cross, and more.

   At such a pregnant moment, Jesus was “transfigured.” The Greek is more interesting: metamorphothe – and yes, if you don’t know Greek, it looks and sounds like “metamorphosis,” a crusty thing opening into a beautiful butterfly. Amazing. Miraculous. Jesus happening.

   His clothes dazzled, but so did his face, shining so brightly, enacting that classic benediction from Numbers 6: “May the Lord make his face to shine upon you.” It happened to these disciples, and perhaps happens to those who are attentive, attuned to Jesus and his appearing.

    “Suddenly” (!) Moses and Elijah appeared. Centuries old dudes! They may symbolize Law and Prophets. Or they are the two guys in the Old Testament who didn’t obviously die and get buried. They were the mountain men, like Christ, familiar with such mystical moments on this high place. They’d been on that mountain, they know its perils, the trembling before the mystery, surviving the annihilating presence.

    They were “talking with one another.” About… what…? We wish we knew! And we wish we could eavesdrop on that conversation! Fair for the preacher to ask – and without attempting an answer. In preaching we simply can reiterate Peter’s ridiculously wild understatement: “It is good that we are here.”

****

   Check out my newest book, The Heart of the Psalms - which (as we head toward Lent!) would be good preacher reading, good preach-ee reading, and also good for groups; Abingdon has a leader guide and a video accompaniment to this!

What can we say on Ash Wednesday?

  Ash Wednesday. I always tell myself and fellow clergy that they don’t come for the homily. They come for the ashes. I still love the great reflection Martin Sheen offered when interviewed by Krista Tippett: “How can we understand these great mysteries of the church? I don’t have a clue. I just stand in line and say Here I am, I’m with them, the community of faith. This explains the mystery, all the love. Sometimes I’m just overwhelmed, just watching people in line. It’s the most profound thing. You just surrender yourself to it.”

   I continue to commend some sort of Lenten fast, although it gets watered down into dieting or substituting beer for wine or whatever you gave up. Jesus fasted for his 40 days, and the saints we adore did the same. The location of his fasting: simply harrowing. Lisa and I visited the St. George's monastery that hangs perilously from a cliff overlooking the Wadi Qelt. It's hot, it's steep, and even today they warn you of brigands and carnivorous creatures in the area. 2 hours almost wore us out. Jesus did 2 hours 12 times daily for 40 days.

   I am enjoying and admiring Chris Green's new Being Transfigured
. He confesses, as we all can, that "my sense of sin is warped / There is nothing more sinful than what we’ve said about sin, and what we’ve done in the name of our hatred of sin." How very "Self-absorbed – and self-negating" our sense of sin can be. "We’re nice but not kind, indulgent not compassionate, permissive not forgiving." Our need isn't to try harder, but a miracle; we need to be released by a divine intervention. 

   I think of my first adult life dog, Abigail, who loved to run in the woods of my rural parish. After she didn't come home one day, I finally found her - enmeshed in some old barbed wire somebody had used as a fence back in the day. The harder she struggled to get out, the more the barbs gashed her skin. I had to urge her to be very, very still, to trust me, so I could extricate her  - and then her wounds required some healing. That's what Lent, and the whole Christian life is like.

  William Placher's terrific Mark commentary cites Alexander Schmemann ("Fasting makes us light, concentrated, sober, joyful, pure"), Macrina Wiederkehr ("Fasting is cleansing. It lays bare our souls. In the Divine Arms we become less demanding and more like the One who holds us. We hunger and thirst for justice, and holiness. We hunger for what is right. What hunger to be saints"), and St. Basil ("Fasting is to refrain from vice"). I'll ponder those for me, whether they worm their way into a sermon or not.

   Our Psalm, the 51st, one of the church's historic "penitential Psalms," bears the weight of this day and season - although we might quibble with the unforeseen implication that David, having seized Bathsheba (the patron saint of #MeToo?), simply repents and expects cleansing - and we conclude all is well. What's the lesson in the ripple effects and lingering impact of our sin - even forgiven (by God) sin?

   Matthew 6 is perfect yet terribly odd for Ash Wednesday. Jesus tells us not to practice our piety visibly (v. 1), and not to disfigure our faces but to wash them (v. 16) – on the very day we disfigure our faces publicly. Nobody at my place though is showing off, sporting ashes for the rest of the day. If anything, they’ll get some strange stares at the store on the way home.

  When I get home, I try to take some time to linger before a mirror – to ponder that I have just been marked with the horror and hope of Jesus’ cross. No hymn captures so thrillingly the paradox of this horror and hope as Isaac Watts’s “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross.” We “survey” the cross. We don’t just glance at it. The soldiers didn’t survey this one. They’d seen plenty of crosses, and had no reason to think this was God. All they saw was a dying, despised person – which was precisely what God was hoping to achieve. More lines in that hymn bear reflection: “Sorrow and love flow mingled down.” Onlookers saw tragedy, maybe justice mingled.

   “Did e’er… thorns compose so rich a crown?” At Elizabeth II’s coronation so long ago, the Archbishop of Canterbury placed St. Edward’s Crown on her head. It was heavy, forged of 22 karat gold, with 444 precious stones, aquamarines, topazes, rubies, amethysts, sapphires. She then knelt to receive the body and blood of our Lord. Did she ponder Jesus’ very different crown, its only ornaments those harsh thorns gashing his forehead, scalp and temples?

   “My richest gain I count but loss.” Lent is the season to reassess what has value, what doesn’t, how much we offer up to God. Do we urge our people to embark on a fast? It’s not dieting. It’s not being glum and feeling sorry for ourselves. It’s solidarity with those who aren’t choosing to fast. It’s weaning ourselves from dependencies on things. It’s an awakening to where our treasure is.

   Where are the “Take the Bible literally!” people when it comes to “Do not lay up treasure on earth”? We prudently save, we check our retirement portfolios, we pay off the house. No use castigating the people, or ourselves. It’s a mark of our brokenness, our desperate need for the true God. The ashes are lie that mark on Cain’s forehead. It’s guilt, and grace.

  And so we invite people into (hopefully) a growing devotion, a loosening of our grip on our treasures, an expansion of God and grace into daily life. Here’s something we did a few years back. At the Baptism of the Lord, we handed out shower tags (we got the idea, and even purchased the tags from Adam Hamilton!), which you hang in the bath: “Lord, as I enter the water to bathe, I remember my Baptism. Wash me by your grace, fill me with your Spirit, renew my soul. I pray that I might live as your child today, and honor you in all that I do.”

   On Ash Wednesday, we picked up on Matthew 6 and handed out closet tags. Jesus said “Go into your closet to pray.” The Greek tameion is an inner room of the house, a storeroom, small, private – reminding us of the need for a dedicated holy space at home. I love this – that if you go into your closet and pray, you are doing God’s will! Picking up on other clothing images in Scripture, here’s how that tag reads: “Jesus said, ‘Go into your closet and pray in secret; and your Father will reward you.’ So pray. Prepare for your day with God. As you dress, remember Romans 14:8, ‘Put on the Lord Jesus Christ,’ and Colossians 3:12, ‘Put on compassion, patience, forgiveness, love – and be thankful. Whatever you do, do it in the name of the Lord Jesus.’”

   Two more items while we’re on Matthew 6. Jesus says “When you pray,” not “If you pray” – and he was assuming 3 set times of prayer as was common Jewish practice then and now. When Will Willimon was Dean of Duke Chapel, he told about a Muslim student who asked him, “Why don’t the Christian students ever pray?” He obviously observed the 5 set daily times for prayer in Islam, and was puzzled that he never ever saw Christians stopping to pray. It’s a judgment call whether you can mention this to your people. I think it’s compelling, and inviting – but some folks have such potent, irrational anti-Muslim feelings that they’ll shut down on you.

   And then Jesus talks about “reward,” shunning earthly reward, but implying quite clearly there are rewards, ultimate rewards to the life of faith. I for one downplay this, remembering a very smart college student who asked me if he could become a Christian if he didn’t believe in eternal life. His angle was he wanted to follow Jesus just because it was good, right, noble and true, not to secure any prize for himself. I admire that – but quite clearly the Gospels and Epistles lay out for us fabulous, unspeakably fantastic rewards, or ultimate realities, for those who believe.

****

   Check out my newest book, The Heart of the Psalms - which (as we head toward Lent!) would be good preacher reading, good preach-ee reading, and also good for groups; Abingdon has a leader guide and a video accompaniment to this! It has a whole chapter devoted to Psalm 51 - pretty important for Ash Wednesday!!

 ** Check out my new podcast, Maybe I'm Amazed - amazing conversations with amazing people who've done amazing things! Recent guests: Kate Bowler, David Wilkinson, Lillian Daniel, Chris Green - and earlier in the series, Civil Rights hero Dorothy Counts Scoggins, UNC basketball coach Roy Williams, 7 time NASCAR champion Jimmie Johnson, Walter Brueggemann, Amy-Jill Levine, and more!

What can we say February 22? Lent 1

    Preaching in Lent: I always wonder, and feel sure I’m not off target in this, if clergy and church staff people care intensely about Lent, but our lay people are uninterested or vaguely aware. So we professionals fixate on it being Lent 1, while our people are thinking simply it’s another Sunday. Alas. And so our texts.

   Genesis 2:15-17, 3:1-7. What a way to begin Lent – with the beginning of humanity, and our fallenness, our brokenness. Jonathan Sacks eyed a “failure of leadership” here, which is primally the failure to take responsibility. Theologians extracted doctrines of original sin and more from this narrative – which is always how doctrine begins, isn’t it?

   Americans brag about their freedom, but we’re all just as habitually turned from God, and stuck in it, as Adam and Eve. Mark Twain: “I don’t know why Adam and Eve get so much credit; I could have done just as well as they did.” Lancelot du Lac, in Camelot: “Had I been made the partner of Eve, we’d be in Eden still” – and then in short order he’s in bed with Guinevere! 

And I love Doug Marlette’s old cartoon which always applies to the “holiness” party in every denomination, Adam and Eve smugly refusing the apple, declaring “No thanks, we’re Presbyterian.”

   So many wise commentaries have pondered this text. Walter Brueggemann points out that we are given a vocation (Till the garden) and a limitation (this 1 tree) – so we forsake the vocation by overstepping our limitations. Gerhard von Rad’s oldie points out that God’s command isn’t oppressive in the least, but it did “place before man the serious question of obedience.” He notices a defensiveness in the couple’s reply to God, adding “touch,” which wasn’t in the speech of the serpent, who “asserts that it knows God better than the woman in her believing obedience does, and so it causes her to step out of the circle of obedience and to judge God and his command as though from a neutral position” – which we all think we can do with great skill!

   Russ Reno’s fabulous Brazos commentary resorts to Aquinas: “God’s commandments do not only train us to realize our natural potential; they also train us for a supernatural end that exceeds our natural end.” God picking out this 1 tree seems arbitrary – and “this is as it must be. If God is to train the natural man toward the end of participating in the supernatural Sabbath rest, then his commandments must transcend our inner-worldly purposes, must exceed our capacity for understanding.” Boom. 
 Do you hear an echo of Bonhoeffer’s little gem, Creation and Fall? “Wherever man attacks the concrete Word of God with the weapon of a principle or an idea of God, there he has become the Lord of God”

   Romans 5:12-19 shows Paul taking a giant leap from the mythical narrative of Genesis toward Augustine’s fully developed doctrine of original sin. As an undergraduate, I wrote a ridiculously long paper on this passage – proving to me, in retrospect, that this is a text for a Bible study, not a sermon. 

 Michael Gorman (in his terrific new commentary) helps us to see where Augustine floundered; his Latin “in whom (in Adam) all sinned” misconstrued the Greek that’s “because all sinned” or “inasmuch as all sinned.” But isn’t it very American to delight in debunking original sin as valid? Twain’s comment above remains spot on. Gorman points to the intertestamental 2 Baruch 54:19: “Adam is not the cause, except only for himself, but each of us has become our own Adam” – which is spot on.

   Gorman on another detail in the text: “The future tense of 5:19 is a logical future – an expression of certainty about the effects of Christ’s obedience on people here and now.” Grace isn’t a kindly attitude on God’s part; it is a power effecting change.

   Genesis 3, Romans 5, and Augustine are in our long tradition of understanding what God is up to. The theological robustness in all this is nowhere better captured than in Michelangelo’s fresco on that Sistine chapel ceiling. We fixate on God’s finger creating Adam. But curled in God’s other arm we see a woman and a child, prefiguring not just Eve as the wife to come, but Mary as the new Eve, and the child as the Second Adam, already well arranged for by God at the moment of creating that First Adam.

   Matthew 4:1-11 is my usual preference for Lent 1, although I may stick with Genesis this year – or dare I pair the two? The wilderness is Eden ruined by the Fall. Jesus shuns the voice of the tempter; he doesn’t eat. Hugely important: in my The Beauty of the Word: the Challenge and Wonder of Preaching, I assess how so much preaching is about us, with moralistic takeaways. Preaching should first of all be about God. With this text, I moan when I hear a sermon asking “How can we overcome temptation the way Jesus did?” What Jesus did, we could never do. That’s the point. He’s our Savior, not our Exemplar (as Dean Robert Cushman put it so memorably in first year theology at Duke!).

   Popular movies have regularly touched on the perils hidden in plain sight in our text. The seizure of power, humorously explicated in the film Bruce Almighty, is contrasted with the determined giving up of power with the ring in The Lord of the Rings – an issue Tolkien parsed flawlessly. I bet churchgoers would join non-churchgoers in asking if the devil is real. In my Good Questions series in the Fall, we put out this 13 minute video of me exploring the question, including Merton’s thoughtful words on “the theology of the devil,” and how the devil most of all wants attention and credit, and also C.S. Lewis’s humorous but insightful vision of the demonic in daily life in Screwtape Letters.

   I like PĆ”draig Ɠ Tuama’s take on the devil’s “if.” It seems to question his identity, as in “if you are who you say you are.” But the Greek ei can as easily mean “since,” as in “because you are you, why don’t you do this?” “It wasn’t a challenge to Jesus’ identity, it was a challenge to his power. Suddenly, it isn’t a devil with cloven feet and fort. It is every day. It is the complication of every moment. Because I am capable? Do it.”

   He continues, declaring this “the story of humanity.” The 1st temptation is simply to do what you can for your own good. Simple. The 2nd he reads as a temptation to suicide. Just end it all. My church family has suffered 3 suicides in the past year and a half; our community has borne the suicides of 4 adolescents. Something huge and agonizing is in the air, and the church had best lead in talking about it, especially with our youth.

   I believe Chris E.W. Green's articulation of what is at stake in this narrative is spot on: "Jesus enters into our existence so completely, so unconditionally, that his reality and ours become mutually determinative. Thanks to that bond, what happens to us happens in him, and what happens in him happens to us." He points out how, for the Desert Fathers, "Jesus was baptized not to wash away his sins but to sanctify the waters; he was tempted not to prove his sinlessness but to hallow the wilderness." Indeed, Jesus suffered - yet "nothing from his birth to his death happened to him but what his Father wanted to happen differently for us." Go back and re-read all that, and slowly - if not for your sermon, then for the growth and understanding in your own soul!

****

   Check out my newest book, The Heart of the Psalms - which (as Lent hath begun!) would be good preacher reading, good preach-ee reading, and also good for groups; Abingdon has a leader guide and a video accompaniment to this!


What can we say March 1? Lent 2

    Genesis 12:1-4a blew my mind week #1 in seminary. Prof. Lloyd Bailey explained how this wasn’t just a thing that happened to Abraham, but was the key to unlock the entire calling of God’s people – to be blessed, to multiply, to be given land (a huge problem historically!), and to be a blessing to everybody else. That’ll preach.

   God calls Abraham to go – but where? How will it work out? I’m reminded of those fishermen who drop their nets to follow Jesus – but where? How will it work out? Walter Brueggemann calls this “a call for a dangerous departure from the presumed world of norms and security.” Risky? Isn’t that what we need? Russ Reno, in his great Brazos commentary, phrases it like this: “The divine plan injects a new possibility into the flow of history rather than acting over or upon humanity from the outside.”

   Reno sees this text as an answer, an antidote to the Babel story in Genesis 11, how the fallen world of grasping is what Abraham is taken from – and that “now God promises to give Abraham-in-particular what humanity-in-general sought to achieve by its own hands whether it gathered to build a tower to heaven: a place, a nation, a name remembered.”

   It’s a journey, a pilgrimage. Abraham never quite arrives, does he? Odd, as part of God’s pledge to him is that he’ll have land – the most problematical item, if you weigh what’s unfolded through history, maybe in the whole Old Testament. This pledge of land has caused wars and irresolvable tensions. 

Brueggemann (in his great book on the promise of the land, Chosen), asks “to what extent that theological claim has come to be or has morphed into an ideological claim that functions as self-justification.” Indeed.

   The other promise is that these chosen ones will be the way God will bless everybody else. It’s not being chosen to be protected, or to be granted special blessings, and certainly not to pass judgment on others. Israel’s will not be a doing for the others, “but that the life of Israel under the promise will energize and model a way for the other nations also to receive a blessings from this God” (Brueggemann). Isn’t this the church’s mission?

   Romans 4:1-5, 13-17, a text I won’t linger on now or in my sermon, takes the call of Abraham and morphs it into something about faith and being reckoned righteous. I love to dissect Paul’s midrashic read of Abraham and why he matters in a Bible study, but am not so good at preaching it. Psalm 121, which we read at gravesides, is also rich in wisdom; for his long journey, Abraham lifted his eyes to uncertain hills; and Jesus and his family, along with all pilgrims in Bible times, sang this as they made their way to Jerusalem for Passover – including Jesus’ last. 

   John 3:1-17. Utterly familiar – and yet I’ve had good cause to rethink it over the years. I was invited to write a book about Birth (in the series, Pastoring for Life: Theological Wisdom for Ministering Well). Listening to moms, doctors, and midwives, and in much research, I have tried to connect what I learned to what it might mean to be born again. I kept wondering why it is that preachers (George Whitefield, Billy Graham, etc.), who’ve talked constantly about being born again, virtually ignore birth itself when theologizing about being born again. They’re men? Never witnessed a birth? Is “born again” really a revivalist mood, a surge of spiritual emotion, or even a zealous commitment to be different?

   Think about it: Nicodemus comes in the dark – like life in the womb, about to be born. When you were born, the first time, wasn’t it true that “God called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were no people, but now you are God’s people” (1 Pet. 2:9). 

   Isn’t it curious that, in explaining this new birth to Nicodemus, Jesus speaks of being born of water and the spirit. Recall your first birth. You were in water. Then you emerged, gasping for air, for a breath – or we can say “spirit,” as the Hebrew ruah, and the Greek pneuma both mean air, and then by extension, spirit. It’s always water, and then the spirit when getting born.

    That you “must” be reborn intrigues. The Greek, deĆ®, isn’t must as in You must do your homework, or You must report for jury duty. It’s more like You must come to my birthday party! or You must come with me to the hospital to see Fred before he dies. It’s love, it’s a deeply personal, can’t-miss-it necessity – like birth.

   The heart of Jesus’ surprising notion of being born again is this: you can’t grit your teeth and get born the first time, and you can’t when you’re born again either. Back in October of 1955, I didn’t think, Hmm, nice day to get born, let’s do it. An entirely passive, unchosen event. Even the mother has zero ability to turn a microscopic zygote into a breathing, squawling person. Birth happens to you, and in you. Rudolf Bultmann, reflecting on Jesus’ reply to Nicodemus’s search for salvation, clarifies that “the condition can only be satisfied by a miracle… It suggests to Nicodemus, and indeed to anyone who is prepared to entertain the possibility of the occurrence of a miraculous event, that such a miracle can come to pass.”

   Given the ways preachers like Whitefield and Graham conducted revivals seeking new births that were marked by a swooning of emotion, it’s important to realize that Jesus didn’t ask Nicodemus to feel anything. There are, of course, intense feelings at birth. The mother giving birth may be overwhelmed with an intensity of joy, or anything else along a broad spectrum of emotion. The one being born though: is birth an emotional high for the baby?

   Of course, the feelings mother and child share in childbirth are the pains, the excruciating squeezes, the tearing of flesh and sometimes the breaking of bones. Could Jesus have imagined such agony when pressing us toward a new birth? Jesus courageously embraced pain, and invited us to follow. Paul, imprisoned and beaten multiple times within an inch of his life for following Jesus, wrote that “When we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’ it is the Spirit himself bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God… provided we suffer with him” (Rom. 8:15-16). No wonder we prefer a happy emotional kind of rebirth at a revival, over against the costly discipleship that is the new life Jesus has in mind for us. It isn’t the feeling, but the fact of the new birth, and the hard facts of union with Jesus in a world puzzled or hostile to his ways.

   By now, of course, we see that Jesus wasn’t asking Nicodemus to behave a little better. It’s radical, a total shift of focus, priorities, behaviors and habits. Bultmann explains it perfectly: “Rebirth means… something more than an improvement in man; it means that man receives a new origin, and this is manifestly something which he cannot give himself.” My first birth defined my origin as a Howell. I have the DNA, I favor my dad, I am who I am. How could I come by a new and different origin? Let’s look to St. Francis of Assisi.

   After fitting in and even excelling as a child and youth, enviably popular, chic and cool, Francis heard the call of Jesus. Taking the Bible quite literally, picking up whatever Jesus said or did and putting it on his to-do list for the day, Francis divested himself of his advantages, including his exquisite, fashionable clothing, which he gave away to the poor. His father, Pietro, a churchgoing, upstanding citizen, took exception, locked his son up for a time, and then sued him in the city square. Giotto’s fresco in the basilica where Francis is buried shows a stark naked Francis, handing the only thing he has left, the clothes off his back, to his father. But his eyes are fixed upward, where we see a hand appearing to bless him from up in the clouds. At this moment, Francis declared, “Until now I have called Pietro Bernardone my father. But, because I have proposed to serve God, I return to him the money on account of which he was so upset, and also all the clothing which is his, wanting to say from now on: ‘Our Father who are in heaven,’ and not ‘My father, Pietro di Bernardone.’” A biblical moment, if we have regard for “You have been born anew, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God” (1 Pet. 2:23), or “I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother” (Matt. 10:35).

   What is we ponder “born again” from the mother’s side? Anne Enright, who shows no evident interest in religion: “A child came out of me. I cannot understand this, or try to explain it. Except to say that my past life has become foreign to me. Except to say that I am prey, for the rest of my life, to every small thing.” Isn’t this what being with Jesus, a child who came out of his mother, is like? The past is laughably past. Every small thing, devoted to this Jesus, matters. 

 Perhaps being born again is like the discovery so many new moms make, articulated beautifully in John O’Donohue’s words:

     Once it began, you were no longer your own.

     A new, more courageous you, offering itself

     In a new way to a presence you can sense

     But you have not seen or known.

   I'd be remiss, if we're trying to parse John 3:16 in light of all this Birth stuff (and oh my gosh, if you're having Holy Communion!), if I didn't share Rachel Marie Stone's marvelous envisioning of Mary's great gift to us: "A girl was in labor with God. She groaned and sweated and arched her back, crying out for her deliverance and finally delivering God, God’s head pressing on her cervix, emerging from her vagina, perhaps tearing her flesh a little; God the Son, her Son, covered in vernix and blood, the infant God’s first breath the close air of crowded quarters… God the Son, her Son, pressed to her bare breast… God the Son, her Son, drank deeply from his mother. Drink, my beloved. This is my body, broken for you." 

What can we say March 8? Lent 3

    Exodus 17:1-7. What a roomy text for Lent! A test in the wilderness, the hard-to-beat question, “Is the Lord among us or not?” Wryly I may take note that it’s the wilderness of Sin, not sin – observing though the sin in Sin. Notice the verbs: they camped, quarreled, thirsted, complained. God’s reply? Not judgment, but mercy. Is the Lord among the quarrellers and complainers? Yes, of course. So the presence is a matter of realization, or embodying, or not deflecting, shoving away?

   This business of demanding proof should draw many people in. Anselm, Aquinas and a host of brilliant people have devised proofs for God’s existence. Logic can’t bend the will, or the heart though. As we’ll see in Philippians 2, Jesus ‘proved’ God by utterly ungodlike actions:  humbling, debased, being abused and killed. There. That’s the only proof you get. 

   As in our Gospel reading’s woman at the well, the people are thirsty – and then they also are thirsty. This story figured prominently in the rest of the Bible. Psalms 81 and 95 remember and issue dire warnings based on it. “O that you would listen to me, Israel!  Do not be stubborn as you were at Meribah.” As C.H. Spurgeon put it, “Let the example of that unhappy generation serve as a beacon to you; do not repeat the offenses which have already more than enough provoked the Lord.”

   Romans 5:1-11 is a rich text, but I’ll veer from preaching on it, given the two dramatic narratives in this week’s readings. I would note that Paul, taking a deep breath after chapters 1 thru 4, exclaims “Therefore we have peace.” Our people will breathe relief – until we read on to be informed that this peculiar peace leads to suffering (verse 3). 

 I think of Mother Maria of Paris, St. Maria now, the Latvian woman killed by the Nazis for her labors in the French resistance, who said “It would be a great lie to tell those who are searching: ‘Go to church, because there you will find peace.’ The opposite is true. The Church tells those who are at peace and asleep: ‘Go to church, because there you will feel real anguish for your sin and the world’s sin. There you will feel an insatiable hunger for Christ’s truth. There, instead of becoming lukewarm, you’ll be set on fire; instead of being pacified, you’ll become alarmed; instead of learning the wisdom of this world, you will become fools for Christ.”

   And I shy away from Paul’s confident “Hope does not disappoint.” Sure it does. And I admire Kate Bowler’s interesting musing: “Hope for the future feels like a kind of arsenic that needs to be carefully administered or it can poison the sacred work of living in the present.” Ponder, ponder, ponder this…

   John 4:5-42. Such a vivid scene, so much drama. The little details dig us deeply into an interpersonal encounter. It’s noon. High sun; it’s hot, the shadows are sharp. She’s tired – midday? Did she go on noon so as to avoid the other women who typically went early morning or late afternoon? The well – 135 feet deep, visitable today, and you can drink from it! – was tantalizingly “near the plot of ground Jacob gave Joseph.” Not on, but near… Here’s a sermon I preached shortly after visiting – and drinking from that well!

   The setup verse (4:4) says Jesus “had to pass through Samaria.” Hardly: this is the hilly, rocky, more dangerous route – even today, situated as it is on the West Bank. This Greek word, deĆ®, is pregnant with a sense of divine necessity. He had to, as it his missional focus required him to go there.

   Samaritans were actually Jewish, but attached to Mt. Gerizim instead of Mt. Zion, and to the Torah but not the Prophets (and not liking the prophets makes them like lots of people we preach to!!!). So close to Judaism – and yet so far. What is it in human nature that makes us most hostile toward the people who are just barely different from us? There’s the hilarious (and crass) scene in The Life of Brian (not for the sermon, just for the preacher’s fun) where the People’s Front of Judea explain “the only people we hate more than the Romans are the Judea People’s Front”…

   She’s despised by Mt. Zionish Jewish guys like Jesus. But this woman is despised even within her own despised group! She is pitiably alone, as in lonely, ostracized. Jesus encounters her – and he too is alone. He becomes what she is. He’s alone, and thirsty, like she is.

   I love David Ford's ruminations (in his great new commentary on John): "Does the woman approach the well provocatively or nonchalantly? Does she project shame, modesty, or sexual availability? What tone of voice does she first use to Jesus - polite, ironic, flirtatious? Does she understand Jesus's request for water as a sexual advance? Is her response to Jeus's offer one of genuine astonishment and openness, ironic dismissal, or wistful longing?" He's so on point on her marital history: "There could have been a mixture of divorces and bereavements. Yet, whatever the truth, a life shot through with disappointment, pain, and grief is suggested."

   He doesn’t judge, or teach a lesson, or even give her water. He asks her to do something for him. Jean Vanier explains, “Jesus is showing us how to approach people who are broken and wounded: not as someone superior, from ‘above,’ but humbly, from ‘below,’ like a beggar. Such people who are already ashamed of themselves do not need someone who will make them even more ashamed, but someone who will give them hope and reveal to them that they have value.”

  I love the idea that Jesus was nothing like David, who encountered a woman mid-day and "took" her: Bathsheba. David assumes a woman is his for the taking. Jesus assumes she is a person, with a story, wounds, dreams, and is more than ready simply to listen to her, to care, to be a non-judgmental presence. David judged Bathsheba as less than noble and his for the taking. Jesus judged the Samaritan woman as of priceless worth.

   Once there was a boy born with an acute case of cerebral palsy who was treated terribly as a young child.  He was sent to another home where his mother noticed how he watched Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood.  She believed Mister Rogers was keeping her son alive.  Some big foundation worked it out for Mister Rogers to visit this boy, and when he did, Mister Rogers asked, “Would you pray for me?”  The boy was thunderstruck because nobody had ever asked him for anything.  He was the object of prayer, not the one to pray for Mr. Rogers.  But now he prays for Mister Rogers and he doesn’t want to die anymore.  Tom Junod witnessed this and privately he congratulated Mister Rogers for being so smart.  But Mister Rogers didn’t know what he meant.  He really wanted the boy’s prayers, saying, “I think that anyone who’s gone through challenges like that must be very close to God.”

    This Samaritan woman does not seem or feel close to God though. Can we hear this woman’s pain? “I have no husband.” She’s not lying, or covering up; it’s a lament, one we all sense in the gut. How many negative images has she been bombarded with, and how much self-recrimination does she tote around in her head? The Bible doesn’t tell us her name – par for the course. She didn’t matter much to anybody else back then – except Jesus, who surely did learn her name, even if John forgot to tell us.

   I’ll guarantee you Jesus asked for and remembered her name. He knew her entire life story, one she’d prefer to cloak. And yet he’s not repulsed. Don’t we all long for such a friend, who can bear our entire, true story, and not shrink back? This is faith, I think, exploring the truth about our story, and experiencing the presence, the mercy. As Vanier puts it, “Jesus invites her, and each one of us, to revisit our past in truth: not just to analyze it or remain trapped in it, but to be liberated from its hold.”

   Jesus knows all about us, but never with a Gotcha! I am moved by Gerhard Lohfink’s vision of final judgment: “When we encounter God in death, we will for the first time recognize with full clarity who we really are. God will have no need to sit in judgment on us, to harangue us. In our encounter with the holy God our eyes will be opened to behold our own selves. We ourselves will judge and condemn the evil in ourselves…” He adds that those we’ve hurt or not helped may also stand before us and stare – becoming our judges! My knees buckle at such the prospect of such an “encounter with the truth about God, about others, about the world, and about ourselves.” But Lohfink says we should rejoice, because as Jesus said “You shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” Only then will we grasp the depth of God’s mercy – and only then can the healing that will be eternity begin.

  She is exposed, she is loved – and then she is filled, refreshed, washed with this incredible living water that Jesus is. Double entendres everywhere: the well is “deep,” as in the depths of her soul, and where Jesus is taking her. Wink, wink as you preach.  

    In my book, Worshipful: Living Sunday Morning All Week, I explore some medieval notions of being hungry and thirsty for the Eucharist – and then Jesus’ own hunger and thirst.  Julian of Norwich wrote that “Jesus will be thirsty until the last soul is saved and joins him in his bliss; his thirst is to have us drawn into him.”  And Bernard of Clairvaux: “My penitence, my salvation, are His food. I myself am His food. I am chewed as I am reproved by Him; I am swallowed as I am taught; I am digested as I am changed; I am assimilated as I am transformed; I am made one as I am conformed to him.”