And yet these venomous snakes are the
healing; it did have to be snakes. Think superstition, magic – or Israelite
religion, with such a homeopathic antidote. An object is controlled by its own
image or effigy. To gaze on an uplifted snake, they believed, could cure ill
effects of the snakes on the ground. Lest you think this is a one-off, a bronze
snake stood in the temple until Hezekiah finally smashed it (2 Kings 18:4).
Israel shared this with their neighbors: Egyptian religious featured serpentine
amulets, cobras denoted royalty. A bronze bowl engraved with a winged snake was
discovered in Nineveh – booty the Assyrians swiped from Israel’s King Ahaz! And
then archaeologists found copper mines near where Israel was meandering in
Numbers 21 – and a 5 inch long copper snake affixed to a staff, dating to the
time of Moses! (Think modern times also:
Asclepius was symbolized by a snake and still is on that little medical symbol we pay no attention to.)
Asclepius was symbolized by a snake and still is on that little medical symbol we pay no attention to.)
You don’t have to tie this to John 3
(although John himself did!) – but it’s preachable. What is lethal is the way
to life; the curse is the way to cure. Certainly the cross works this way:
it’s a sign of horror, the killing of the Son, and yet it is itself the cure. Similarly, it is only in our dying that we come to life; it is the killing of our sin on the cross that frees us.
it’s a sign of horror, the killing of the Son, and yet it is itself the cure. Similarly, it is only in our dying that we come to life; it is the killing of our sin on the cross that frees us.
So, before visiting Ephesians 2, which can
also be woven into all this, let’s stick with John 3:14-21. Nicodemus has made
his famous nocturnal visit to Jesus. His puzzlement over being “born again” is
itself fascinating, and can’t be lopped off from our precise reading for today.
Jesus speaks of a whole new life – and it’s not an emotional experience, this
being born again (evangelical fantasies, and churchgoer confusion and guilt
notwithstanding). It’s God’s work – and our verses explain how God pulled off regenerating
us.
I love Jean Vanier’s phrasing, unwittingly linking John to Numbers: “This journey, our pilgrimage of love, begins and deepens as we hear God murmur within our hearts: ‘I love you just as you are. I so love you that I come to heal you and to give you life. Do not be afraid. Open your hearts. It is all right to be yourself. You do not have to be perfect or clever. You are loved just as you are. As you become more conscious that you are loved, you will want to respond to that love with love, and grow in love.’”
I love Jean Vanier’s phrasing, unwittingly linking John to Numbers: “This journey, our pilgrimage of love, begins and deepens as we hear God murmur within our hearts: ‘I love you just as you are. I so love you that I come to heal you and to give you life. Do not be afraid. Open your hearts. It is all right to be yourself. You do not have to be perfect or clever. You are loved just as you are. As you become more conscious that you are loved, you will want to respond to that love with love, and grow in love.’”
We see John 3:16 on billboards, t-shirts,
etc.; some terrific music, my favorite being “God So Loved the World” by
John Stainer (or this
one by Bob Chilcott!) drives the verse home.
The omnipresence is striking, and would have shocked most Christians through the centuries. John 3:16 was never the verse until the modern American revival movement – so chalk it up to Billy Graham I suppose. The verse isn’t a problem, although it diminishes the breadth of the Bible’s vision for us and creation. Or does it? If we read it slowly, we see it’s better than we dreamed. It doesn’t say “For God so loved you, you religious person, that he gave his son – that is, had him crucified in your place – so that whoever believes in him, that is, whoever confesses his sin and agrees Jesus saves him, will not perish but go to heaven.” Instead it says God so loved – the world, the kosmos, the whole thing! He gave his son – but he gave him when the Word became flesh, at Christmas, and in his healing and teaching, and in his crucifixion and resurrection, which for John is way more about the glorification of God than me getting off for my sins. Belief, for John, is way more than mental assent or repentance and feeling forgiven. It’s following, it’s union with the living Christ, it’s being part of the Body.
The omnipresence is striking, and would have shocked most Christians through the centuries. John 3:16 was never the verse until the modern American revival movement – so chalk it up to Billy Graham I suppose. The verse isn’t a problem, although it diminishes the breadth of the Bible’s vision for us and creation. Or does it? If we read it slowly, we see it’s better than we dreamed. It doesn’t say “For God so loved you, you religious person, that he gave his son – that is, had him crucified in your place – so that whoever believes in him, that is, whoever confesses his sin and agrees Jesus saves him, will not perish but go to heaven.” Instead it says God so loved – the world, the kosmos, the whole thing! He gave his son – but he gave him when the Word became flesh, at Christmas, and in his healing and teaching, and in his crucifixion and resurrection, which for John is way more about the glorification of God than me getting off for my sins. Belief, for John, is way more than mental assent or repentance and feeling forgiven. It’s following, it’s union with the living Christ, it’s being part of the Body.
I’d say whether you preach on John or
Ephesians, these two texts illuminate one another in lovely ways. Ephesians
2:1-10: the pivotal verse is 5, not 8 (which is cited so often). Paul (let’s
give it to Paul and not confuse church people about authorship) begins by
pronouncing us dead – as sensible, as we’re reading his words and hence very
much alive, as Jesus’ counsel to Nicodemus to be born again. The word
translated “dead” is nekros; I’ve
gotten to walk around a few necropolises from Bible times. Eerie – including
the catacombs where Christians worshipped.
Sermons have to explain how we’re dead
while we have a pulse; Walker Percy might help. His parents died while he was
very young, and he barely survived tuberculosis. Deeply influenced by
Kierkegaard (who had written wisely of our “sickness unto death”), Percy
creates characters like Dr. Tom More (in The
Moviegoer), who lives in Paradise Estates, but really it’s a living Hell.
People “have it all” but they are hollow and miserable. Even the meek priest
confesses, “I am surrounded by the corpses of souls. We live in a city of the
dead.”
His later novels, especially Thanatos Syndrome and Love in the Ruins, play on these same
themes. I’m struck again by the moment when More refused to take Samantha to
Lourdes – because he was afraid she would be healed! Our worst fear is not that
God is dead but that God is alive, and it won’t do just to drink and soak up
pleasure. Again, in Numbers and John, it only in the confrontation with death,
it is only by dying, that life unfolds, especially this miraculous life in
Christ.
Some preachers might resort to the Walking
Dead as an image, but that’s just too creepy even for me... although R.C. Sproul, in his tiny book What Does it Mean to Be Born Again?, does say that before being reborn, "We were spiritual zombies - the walking dead. We were biologically alive but spiritually dead."
Clearly, Ephesians 2 exposes how our plight
is our whole person, not this or that misdeed. It’s my mind, my flesh, my
thoughts, actions and cravings. And yet God is merciful. No, God is rich
in mercy (the Greek is polyeleos, very
merciful, manifoldly merciful!). Paul’s hyperbolic language should be noted by
the preacher – as if words fail Paul (and hence the preacher). It’s not just
grace, of the wealth or grace, but the surpassing wealth of grace!
And then a close reading of v. 8 is
instructive. Notice the Greek word order. Grace comes early – to emphasize its
centrality. “Gift of God” is really “God’s gift,” God coming first, unusually
in the Greek, to fix our attention on whose grace this is. Notice there is an
article (the, that) before grace. So it’s not “For by grace you are saved” but
“For by that grace you are saved” – that is, the grace celebrated in verses 5
and 7. Faith is not a work, it is not a clever, even spiritual decision. Faith
is God’s work; faith is all gift. “End of faith as its beginning,” Charles
Wesley shrewdly wrote. Faith, St. Augustine helped us to see, isn’t the human
contribution to salvation. Otherwise you get spiritual cockiness, no matter how
grinningly spiritual. Markus Barth wrote, “The bragger is man in revolt against
God, and a tyrant over his fellow man. But he who boasts of God and accepts his
own weakness gives God the glory he is due.”
Of course, it’s salutary that the
lectionary didn’t clip things off after v. 8. Verses 9-10 debunk any overly
simplistic notion of “We’re saved by grace not works” – as Paul then, as if to
keep us off balance (or twisting in the wind!) explains that we are “created
for good works.” Maybe it’s all in how we construe who we are, whose we are,
what defines us, and what our doing emanates from.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.