Worship idea: we've asked people to bring a small picture of a loved one to hold during the service. In my sermon, I'll play off John O'Donohue's poem about the loss of a child: "No one knows the wonder your child awoke in you, your heart a perfect cradle to hold its presence. Now you sit bereft, your eyes numbed... You will wear this absence like a secret locket... Let the silent tears flow, and when your eyes clear perhaps you'll glimpse how your eternal child... parents your heart and persuades the moon to send new gifts ashore."
While in our worship we’ll use the All
Saints’ Day lections (see below), the November 3 readings are themselves powerful and
sufficient to the day. Habakkuk 1:1-4,
2:1-4 images a sentinel on a watchtower (I’m listening to Bob Dylan’s, and then Jimi Hendrix’s versions…)
– an impeccable image for our longing and patient waiting for the dawning of God’s
good kingdom. Near the end of Homecoming,
Marilynne Robinson’s best (maybe? my opinion?) novel, we find this reflection
on memory and death: “But every memory is turned over and over again, every
word, however chance, written in the heart in the hope that memory will fulfill
itself, and become flesh, and that the wanderers will find a way home, and the
perished, whose lack we always feel, will step through the door finally and
stroke our hair with dreaming, habitual fondness, not having meant to keep us
waiting so long.” Not accidentally, this watchtower moment climaxes in Hab. 2:4
– the verse Paul alighted upon when he was figuring out how to explain the way
faith in grace is what saves.
Luke
19:1-10 similarly would work for All Saints. Jesus comes to the home of Zaccheus
(“a wee little man was he…”).
We are titans, and even the saints weren’t giants. Zaccheus’s smallness is a
mirror – or perhaps we ponder Tolkien’s hobbits from the shire as the hope and
future of Middle Earth, or that other child’s song, “They are weak, but he is
strong.” Luke’s punch line zooms in on what matters: “The Son of man came to
seek and save the lost,” not the clever or well-placed or even the church
members, Bible readers and believers. Jesus’ intriguing, mystifying use of “Son
of man” (as the Ethiopian eunuch asked, “Does he refer to himself or another?”)
leads us to the first of our All Saints Lections:
Daniel
7:1-3, 15-18. The exotic setting and vivid language of verse 1 sets the
tone for high drama. It’s just fun in the pulpit to say “Belshazzar,” and
perhaps then to image Daniel, in the shadows of such a dreamy place, dreaming –
not the kind Freud could explain, but the kind God gives and in which we share.
Dreaming still matters – and just as a knot in the gut may turn out to be a
malignancy or a pregnancy, the dream may be a nightmare or something glorious.
Daniel is terrified – but the monsters haunting him in the dark are nothing
more than the temporary, vapid powers of this world about to be defeated by the
powers of good, light and love. I wouldn’t squander much time explicating which
beast represented Persia and which the Greeks – as later on it’s Antiochus
Epiphanes, then Nero or Domitian, and ultimately the Hitlers, Stalins and other
arrogant megalomaniacs who strut across the stage of history. They are undone
by a humble, unarmed, suffering one.
Daniel’s dream vision has been
made the linchpin in N.T. Wright’s explication of Jesus as Son of Man
instigating The Day the Revolution Began.
Daniel 7’s “little horn” is silenced, the monsters condemned, God’s kingdom
inaugurated – reminding us that All Saints’ Day isn’t merely about eternal life
for those who’ve died, but the comprehensive, cosmic dawning of God’s kingdom
in its fulness! Again, the new ones who will reign are the little people, the
hobbit-like ones, the “saints.”
Christians have often been
irresponsible hopers in God’s ultimate victory, not engaging in God’s work now.
Sib Towner explains why quietism isn’t the interim ethic for those with
apocalyptic hope: “The waiting is an active waiting. It includes the
maintenance of sharp identity, the heightening of interpretative skills,
faithfulness before unjust demands of the foreign rulers, and fidelity to
Yahweh in all things.”
Before I deal with death and resurrection, I'll focus on holy lives, courageous lives. Hard not to, as I'm just returning from our church's "Deep South Pilgrimage." In Selma, Montgomery and Birmingham, we retraced the steps of heroes who shed blood on holy ground. John Lewis, after nearly being killed, crossed over the Edmund Pettus Bridge - so can I play on "crossing over" as heroic action now and entering eternal life later on? Without diverting into race-as-an-issue, I hope it will play in the background and invite us to ponder how much courage matters - still.
Before I deal with death and resurrection, I'll focus on holy lives, courageous lives. Hard not to, as I'm just returning from our church's "Deep South Pilgrimage." In Selma, Montgomery and Birmingham, we retraced the steps of heroes who shed blood on holy ground. John Lewis, after nearly being killed, crossed over the Edmund Pettus Bridge - so can I play on "crossing over" as heroic action now and entering eternal life later on? Without diverting into race-as-an-issue, I hope it will play in the background and invite us to ponder how much courage matters - still.
I’ll allude to Daniel but will
preach primarily on Ephesians 1:11-23
(although we’ll sing David Haas’s wonderful “Blest Are They,” and I
will allude to the Gospel also). I doubt I’ll do a lot of explaining the text,
and I certainly wouldn’t try to make such powerful words “relevant” or any such
nonsense. They speak for themselves. Mine will be to relish the words, being
personally awed by them, like a docent in a museum, pointing with gawking delight.
The luxurious, lavish verbiage had to be mind-boggling to the early Christians,
meager as their resources and prospects were. Frank Thielman is right: “Words
that emphasize God’s meticulous planning pile up one upon another – purpose,
work, counsel, will – how privileged are we!” Heirs, inheritances, riches,
glory, destiny...
This last word needs a little
parenthesis, doesn’t it? The old “God is in control” notion is ridiculous, of
course. I love how Markus Barth (Karl’s son!) clarifies how personal this
destining is: “It pertains exclusively to the relationship of the Father to his
children. If no wise human father would treat his children according to a
schedule fixed before their birth, how much less would the Father who is
blessed in Ephesians 1:3-14!”
The responsibilities of even the
most fabulous heirs was driven home to me at the World Methodist Council in
1986 when Donald English reported on attending the wedding of Sarah Ferguson
and Prince Andrew – and how the couple, immensely wealthy, able to do whatever
they might wish, had bowed and pledged fealty to the crown, to the “rights and
responsibilities” that went with being a royal couple.
I love Paul’s “prayer report”
here. It’s not so much that What we asked God for was ‘answered.’ What
intrigues is the content of his prayer – that the recipients, the objects of
his praying, might have a “spirit of wisdom and revelation,” that their “eyes
of their hearts might be enlightened”
(reminding me of St. Francis’s constant
prayer during his season of conversion, “Most high,
glorious God, enlighten the darkness of my heart, and give me, Lord, correct
faith, firm hope, perfect charity, wisdom and perception, that I may do what is
truly your most holy will.”
Paul also prays for 3 things (Do
you wish people prayed this for you? for one another?): (1) the hope to which he has called you, (2) the
God’s glorious inheritance, and (3) the magnitude of God! Do we get such prayer
requests? What if we did? The hope business: Emily Dickinson suggested that “Hope
is the thing in the soul with feathers…” – but is it in the soul? Or is it more
about God? Markus Barth, again: “The emphasis lies not so much on the mood of
the person hoping as on the substance or subject matter of expectation.” It’s
the thing hoped for.
Christopher Lasch (in his marvelous The True and Only Heaven) clarified that optimism is the fantasy
that all will be better tomorrow, and it depends on us; but hope is the ability
to deal with tomorrow if things aren’t better – and it depends not on us but on
God.Clarence Jordan shrewdly pointed out that the poor prefer Luke, while the rest of us delight in Matthew! Jesus spoke to the poor, the nobodies – and blessed them. They were accustomed to being cursed, ignored or blamed – as we see in our world today. How amazing was Jesus? For All Saints’ Day, it’s hard not to hear the line “Blessed are those who mourn.” We come mourning, indeed – but we grieve as those who have hope (1 Thessalonians 4:13). Again, I trust the reading of the names in God’s holy place more than I trust my frail words to express the hope of the Gospel!
Robert Schuller tried to modernize
the text with the rubric “The Be-Happy Attitudes.” But Jesus isn’t issuing
commandments, much less doling out advice for a chipper life. He blesses, he
embraces, loves, knows, recognizes, and gives hope to the hopeless, to the
people nobody else wants – and then he brings down a Woe! on the big dogs, those who think they’re somebody, and
especially the self-righteous. Jesus’ words are light years from the
conventional wisdom of our day. He doesn’t say Blessed are the good-looking, the successful, the well-connected, the
white Americans, and he doesn’t say Woe
to the immigrant, the unemployed, the lonely or the homeless. The preacher
has one more chance just now to chip away at the façade of thin,
culturally-mashed-down thinking, and open the window into Jesus’ revolutionary
worldview.
***
You might appreciate my Advent book picking up on phrases and themes in various Christmas carols: Why This Jubilee? Useful for church people - and for preachers.
***
You might appreciate my Advent book picking up on phrases and themes in various Christmas carols: Why This Jubilee? Useful for church people - and for preachers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.