Proverbs 1:20-33. I dream of preaching a series on Proverbs; one day... As people navigate what they perceive as boundaries between sacred and secular, it’s intriguing that Proverbs appears to teach about secular things, while the sacred was covered by priests, temple, sacrifice. Wisdom understands that nothing is merely secular; everything is sacred. God made and cares about everything. What we do with our pots and pans, whether you step on a worm, the next check you write, or a tree in your backyard: all are part of God’s world, all require some patient attention from the spiritually attuned. John Wesley’s great gift to Christendom is what he called “practical divinity.”
Derek Kidner described Proverbs well: “Its function in Scripture is to put godliness into working clothes; to name business and society as spheres in which we are to acquit ourselves with credit to our Lord, and in which we are to look for his training . . . There are details of character small enough to escape the mesh of the Law and the broadsides of the Prophets.” Wisdom is comprehensive discipleship.
Our text is the key in the 9 chapter overture to the book, which sets
the pithy sayings in rich context, originating with God, intimately interwoven
into the life of faith. Alternating voices, parent with child, then the Wise
Woman in the street, back home, then to a more wily, dangerous Woman in the
street, back to the family, before the Wise Woman has her final say. Wisdom is
all over family life, ants crawling in the yard, and also the street, the
workplace, shopping, friendship, strangers, politics, and real dangers to body and
soul.
Street dangers? Ask a parent of an adolescent, any anybody with a pulse.
Out there we encounter real danger, delusion, the very real, possibility that
poor choices will be made, that wisdom will be frittered away or flat-out
rejected. This is the drama of the inner life. Real, daily life with God is a
thousand little choices in hundreds of reenacted scenes. Are you going on to
perfection? Or just sliding by, hoping God isn’t interested in business,
romance, or friendship, or that all will be forgiven—so why risk becoming
fastidious?
“Wisdom
shouts.” Wisdom isn’t inaudible. She’s like a street preacher or a peddler, but
with holy wares. If Proverbs fretted over the competing racket in the world,
how much harder is it for us today to hear Wisdom’s voice above the din? Some
inner quiet, and an attentive ear are required.
Wisdom asks “How long?” Usually this
question, frequently occurring in the Psalms, is voiced toward God by those
puzzled by God’s seeming absence. How often is our sense of God’s absence a
predictable outcome of a life that has “paid no attention” to Wisdom? Tone of
voice is hard to determine in Scripture. “They didn’t want my advice”: is
Wisdom annoyed, or disgusted? Or is there a plaintive pain in her voice?
Her shouts in the public square remind us of the origins of Methodism, where the Wesleys took the Gospel out of the churches and into the streets and factories. We also recall that Jesus—“the foolishness of God . . . wiser than human wisdom”—was executed on a wide street for all to see; his voice still calls to us, “How long will . . . mockers hold their mocking dear? . . . I invited you, but you rejected me.”
Psalm 19 is pretty inviting for a sermon. I preached
on it during our Psalm series in the Spring (watch here). We begin with Creation, big
creation, like from 15 billion years ago, inviting us to be in awe, not because
it’s photogenic, but because it reveals God’s mind and heart. There’s music in
the air… Ancient people believed the stars left music in their wake as they
streamed across the sky. Science says No, but then we miss the awe, the joy.
Paired quite naturally with this is the Psalm’s pleasure, sheer delight in the
Law. Not a burden, not to make us chafe, but the marvelous gift of the God who
created so we then can be created, re-created as beautiful people in sync with
God’s lovely, sweet ways in the world.
In my sermon, I explored this healthy, joyful approach to the law, leading off with Zora Neale Hurston's great capture of the moment Moses came down from Sinai with the tablets: "Moses lifted the freshly chiseled tablets of stone in his hands and gazed down the mountain to where Israel waited. He knew a great exultation. Now men could be free. They had something of the essence of divinity. They had the chart and compass of behavior. They need not stumble into blind ways and injure themselves. This was bigger than Israel. Israel could be a heaven for all men forever, by these sacred stones. With flakes of light still clinging to his face, Moses turned to where Joshua waited for him. Joshua, I have laws!"
And then on the being "perfect," this lovely reflection from Kathleen Norris. She was asked by a priest if she'd pray for him. She fretted about whether she could do this well or not: "I realized that was my pride speaking, the old perfectionism that’s dogged me since I was a child. Well, or badly was beside the point. Of course I could pray, and I did. Perfectionism is one of the scariest words I know. It is a marked characteristic of American culture, a serious psychological affliction that makes people too timid to take risks and causes them to suffer when, although they’ve done the best they can, their efforts fall short of some imaginary standard. ‘Perfect’ isn’t about striving for impossible goals. It is taken from a Latin word meaning ‘complete, entire, full-grown.’ To those who originally heard it, the word conveyed ‘mature’ rather than what we mean today by ‘perfect.’"
James
3:1-12 is a scary text for the clergy. We’re judged against some higher
standard? We might push back against laity who think so. They have a biblical
point – although they might veer into irrelevancies. We are called to lead, not
just by droning on up front in worship, but in living a life that is
interesting, and at least veering toward the holy. James’s word “perfect” in
verse 2 is teleios in Greek, meaning mature,
complete, not squeaky clean, mistake-free, unbroken. We Methodist clergy
promise at our ordination that we will be going on to perfection. Not a
flawless but a purposeful life and ministry direction. A wise old preaching
once said “If you’re not going on to perfection, then where exactly are you
headed?”
The image of the bit in the horse’s mouth illustrates – as Plato envisioned the controlling of the passions in the opening sentences of The Phaedrus. It’s not tamping down our passions, but directing them. If you’ve ridden horses, or driven a motorboat (the rudder image here also!), talk about that, how it’s not afflicting the horse or the boat, but the only way peacefully to move forward in a beautiful way to some attractive destination.
The genuinely scary small thing is, of
course, the tongue. We’ll face an uphill battle persuading our people that how
we talk, what we post to Facebook, our chatter at a diner or by the
watercooler, matters to God, and is our witness. It’s not mouthing sugary sweet
things, but asking if our words build up, are constructive, and in some way mirror
the Fruit of the Spirit. In my book, Worshipful, I look closely at how we talk
in worship, so the creed, the prayers, etc., and how then we are learning how
to talk out there. Not a testimony of how I came to Christ, but some wisdom
perhaps?
Richard Bauckham, commenting on this passage way back in 1998, was remarkably prescient about the sad, rancorous place we’ve found ourselves when it comes to that perilously fiery small thing, the tongue: “The best instance in which a contemporary concern approaches James’s moral interest in the tongue is that of the mass media, whose power to distort the truth and to do considerable harm to private persons, as well as exerting considerable influence on political events, for good or ill, has become more and more evident.”
Mark 8:27-38 is the axis on which the entire story of Jesus turns. If you’ve not preached well on this, you should… although I may go with Proverbs and James as I’ve covered this text quite a few times. I’ll point you to my previous blog – although I would add these spot-on insightful renderings from Sarah Ruden’s new translation of The Gospels: instead of “He spoke openly,” she has “He was giving this discourse with confident freedom.” Peter spoke “sternly” to him. Jesus then “castigated” Peter. And then her championship line: “If someone wants to follow behind me, let him renounce all claim to himself, pick up the stake he’ll be hung on, and follow me.” Boom. All spiritual sentimentality swept aside in a moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.