Colossians
2:6-19 continues this eloquent epistle’s soaring Christological assessment
of Jesus and his implications for us. We “continue to live in him” – and the
verb literally means “walk.” As we walk around, we are in him, he is in us – or
I think of Pasolini’s wonderful film “The Gospel According to St.
Matthew,” where Jesus is always walking somewhere, striding purposefully
and urgently, the disciples struggling to keep up, as he teaches, looking back
over his shoulder.
This text reminds us that there are two parallel stories, two plots unfolding all the time: the obvious story of the world you see in the news and as you look around, but the other a hidden, elusive but certain narrative that unfolds unseen, entirely at odds with the other story, leading to God and goodness and redemption. The secret is not being deluded or diverted by the first story. William Temple famously said the world is like a shop window into which some devious person has sneaked at night and switched all the pricetags around. The lunacy of life is that we spend ourselves then on what has little value, missing the precious stuff.
The paradox of the God story reaches its
climax in the cross. The powers seem to have done him in and showed who’s boss.
But from Colossians’s perspective, Jesus was dis-arming the powers, making a
public spectacle of them. Like “That’s all you’ve got?” Or “This is where evil
and the world wind up.” The striking image of nailing the law and its demands
to the cross bears much reflection. I love Austin Farrer’s wisdom: “What, then, was
done to this body? It was stripped, scourged, and nailed to a cross: stripped
of all dignity and all possession, scourged with the stroke of penal justice,
and nailed up like a dead thing while it was still alive. The body you receive
in this sacrament accomplished its purpose by nailing to a tree. You are to
become this body, you are to be nailed: nailed to Christ's sacrificial will.
The nails that hold you are God's commandments, your rules of life, prayers,
confessions, communions regularly observed. Let us honour the nails for
Christ's sake, and pray that by the virtue of his passion they may hold fast.”
Luke 11:1-13 captures the disciples’ best request of
Jesus: “Lord, teach us to pray.” They had overheard and observed Jesus’
intimacy with God, Abba, and wanted in on it. I suspect our people want and
need, above all else, to learn to pray, how to talk to God; like Paul, they are
dimly aware that “We do not know how to pray as we ought” (Rom. 8:26). We know
prayer gets winnowed down into 911 panicked calls for health assistance.
Bonhoeffer’s wisdom here is unforgettable:
“The phrase ‘learning to pray’ sounds strange to us. If the heart does not overflow and begin to
pray by itself, we say, it will never ‘learn’ to pray. But it is a dangerous error, surely very
widespread among Christians, to think that the heart can pray by itself. For
then we confuse wishes, hopes, sighs, laments, rejoicings – all of which the
heart can do by itself – with prayer… Prayer does not mean simply to pour out
one’s heart. It means rather to find the way to God and to speak with him,
whether the heart is full or empty.”
Bonhoeffer used a helpful analogy. Children do not just know how to talk. Rather, “The child learns to speak because his father speaks to him. He learns the speech of his father.” So it is as we learn to pray. And the child must be shaped and molded in ways that may not suit the child’s immediate desires. If we are to pray aright, perhaps it is quite necessary that we pray contrary to our own heart. Not what we want to pray is important, but what God wants us to pray. If we were dependent entirely on ourselves, we would probably pray only the fourth petition of the Lord’s prayer. But God wants it otherwise. The richness of the Word of God ought to determine our prayer, not the poverty of our heart.” Or as C.S. Lewis put in, “In prayer we lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us.”
Luke 11 begins with The Lord’s Prayer, well worth much explication, or a series of classes. Here is a little email series on it I sent out a few years back. Use it if you’d like. How different is this prayer from our usual praying! It’s about God more than me and my wishes – which get undermined, if Huxley was right in saying “Thy kingdom come means My kingdom go.” “Thy will be done on earth as in heaven” will leave us plenty to do, making heavenly realities happen here and now. The reflexive forgiveness requirement is haunting, and bears repeating every few minutes in our rancorous culture.
Bonhoeffer used a helpful analogy. Children do not just know how to talk. Rather, “The child learns to speak because his father speaks to him. He learns the speech of his father.” So it is as we learn to pray. And the child must be shaped and molded in ways that may not suit the child’s immediate desires. If we are to pray aright, perhaps it is quite necessary that we pray contrary to our own heart. Not what we want to pray is important, but what God wants us to pray. If we were dependent entirely on ourselves, we would probably pray only the fourth petition of the Lord’s prayer. But God wants it otherwise. The richness of the Word of God ought to determine our prayer, not the poverty of our heart.” Or as C.S. Lewis put in, “In prayer we lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us.”
Luke 11 begins with The Lord’s Prayer, well worth much explication, or a series of classes. Here is a little email series on it I sent out a few years back. Use it if you’d like. How different is this prayer from our usual praying! It’s about God more than me and my wishes – which get undermined, if Huxley was right in saying “Thy kingdom come means My kingdom go.” “Thy will be done on earth as in heaven” will leave us plenty to do, making heavenly realities happen here and now. The reflexive forgiveness requirement is haunting, and bears repeating every few minutes in our rancorous culture.
Having supplied this prayer as a good
sample, Jesus continued with a story of a man banging on his friend’s door at
midnight, demanding bread. George Buttrick once described prayer as “beating on
Heaven’s door with bruised knuckles in the dark.” Persistence in prayer will be
hard for us in our “quick” culture, where speed and efficiency are everything,
where we press a button and stuff gets delivered to your door. Prayer is not
quick. Pray is not efficient. Communion with God isn’t won in fifteen seconds.
The preachers should acknowledge that “Ask
and it will be given you” is more discouraging than hopeful – as it fosters the
illusion that “prayer works.” If it works, it doesn’t work very well – and people
are grateful when pastor acknowledges what every Christian knows all too well.
C.S. Lewis can help us: “The very question ‘Does prayer work?’ puts us in the
wrong frame of mind from the outset. ‘Work’: as if it were magic, or a machine
– something that functions automatically. Prayer is either a sheer illusion, or
else it is a personal contact between incomplete persons (ourselves) and the
one utterly concrete Person (God). Prayer in the sense of petition, asking for
things, is a small part of it. Confession and penitence are its threshold,
adoration its sanctuary, the presence and vision and enjoyment of God its bread
and wine. In it God shows Himself to us.”
****
Prayer, public and private, is a major feature of my book Worshipful: Living Sunday Morning All Week. And I also wrote a little laity study book called The Beautiful Work of Learning to Pray: 31 Lessons.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.