Jayber ponders the death of his friend Forrest in World War II: “I imagine that soldiers who are killed in war just disappear from the places where they are killed. Their deaths may be remembered by the comrades who saw them die, if the comrades live to remember. Their deaths will not be remembered where they happened. They will not be remembered in the halls of government. Where do dead soldiers die who are killed in battle? They die at home – in Port William and thousands of other little darkened places, in thousands upon thousands of houses like Miss Gladdie’s where The News comes, and everything on the tables and shelves is all of a sudden a relic and a reminder forever.” Memorial Day? Check. Segue into Gospel hope? Check!
Acts 1:6-14 overlaps with the reading for The Ascension, Acts 1:1-11, which is marked on the calendar as Thursday, May 21. Whether you’re preaching Acts 1 as Easter 7 or as Ascension, I’ll refer you to my blog from a couple of years ago, which has a pretty thorough look at these texts, with illustrative material.
1
Peter 4:12-14, 5:6-11. I’m not fond of what I tend to view as a vapid
Christian habit – the lifting up of a single Bible verse as an amulet of
protection, or a medicinal dose of comfort. But 1 Peter 5:7 is quite good,
something I text out now and then to my mass text distribution – and people
love it, as they should. “Cast your cares upon the Lord, for he cares for you.” {I'm not as fond of "Cast your anxieties on him," as it begins to feel more about me and my inner self than "cares," which are usually real things out there... but it's not awful.}
I wonder about a sermon that just settles around that invitation, reflecting on
how much we need this, how it’s not a quick fix or a blithe assumption that God
will do what I demand, that it’s the sharing of our anxieties, our darkness,
whatever we care about, with the assurance that God cares. That’s as much as we
really want from the people we love: my wife can’t fix my trouble, but she
cares; my best friend might be clueless about my work situation, but he cares.
It’s not a forsaking of responsibility or
even asking God to make up the little deficit of what you can’t manage for
yourself. I think about Henri Nouwen’s book he wrote during his own darkest days:
“You so much want to heal yourself, fight your temptations, stay in control.
But you cannot do it yourself. Every time you try, you are more discouraged. So
you must acknowledge your powerlessness. You have to say Yes fully to your
powerlessness in order to let God heal you.” He notes how addiction recovery
begins, continues and ends on just this assumption: you are powerless. And all
our troubles are addictive, aren’t they?
And then there’s Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s
marvelous little book on the Psalms, which are as good a primer in how to pray
as I’ve ever known: “The Psalms cast every difficulty and agony on God: ‘We can
no longer bear it, take it from us, and bear it yourself, you alone can handle
suffering.’” After all, verse 7, the little golden nugget, hinges on what Peter
just said in verse 6: “Humble yourselves.” The humble know they aren’t masters
of the universe, and that the grit of free will might just spiral you into ever
worsening maladies.
At the same time, verses 6 and 7 keep some
rigorous company, don’t they? Verse 7 is followed by counsel to be disciplined,
and to keep alert. If you’re in a pickle, and you cast your cares upon the
Lord, and there is some lightening of the burden, you’ll be right back where
you were in a few hours without the discipline of new habits, avoiding perilous
places and people. Sam Wells wittily wrote that “Ethics is not about being
clever in a crisis, but about forming a character that does not realize it has
been in a crisis until the ‘crisis’ is over.”
Hence not merely how to cope with but how to
grow from or even avert the “fiery ordeal.” Sounds like flaming torment – but
the Greek, peirasmos, is the same
word used for Jesus being “tested” in the wilderness, with the connotation of
test, trial, discipline. The worst of combating difficulty is feeling alone; 1
Peter offers good company: we “share” (the Greek is koinonia!) in Jesus’ sufferings!
This might be a word for clergy more than
it’s a word for clergy to preach to the people. And the sneaky peril is this: I
suffer in my ministry – so can I safely conclude it’s because I’m so in
fellowship with Jesus? Or is it because I’ve been a dufus and have
miscalculated my emotional capital or what my people can bear in love?
** I’ll
add here that I like to seed a sermon by texting all my people with a question.
A question I ask them, apart from sermon preparation, is simply “How can I pray
with you?” I get like a zillion replies, and reading them breaks your heart.
For this Sunday, if I’m preaching 1 Peter’s “cares” or the Gospel we’re about
to consider, asking our people “What are your cares, what are you suffering?”
This prepares them for worship (and life with God), creates solidarity within
the Body – and also provides me with something to ponder or even use in my
sermon. If I’m preaching 1 Peter, I may just read a sampling. Then their hearts
break too – and maybe break open to new life in Christ.
John
17:1-11. We are at the very end of the very long Last Supper. Much has
happened, much has been said, they’ve lingered over the meal. And then a long pause. The action, stately as it has been, halts. It's time for contemplation. Jesus lifts his eyes toward heaven. He's already caught up in what he's been talking about with them: being one with the Father.
And so they overhear him praying. How puzzled, moved, confused and awed they must have been. Jesus prays to be glorified – which is what they desperately wanted for him (and for themselves!). But the glory, in John’s Gospel, isn’t a titanic win, some shining, towering victory.
It’s the Cross. It’s the nails and thorny crown, the blood, the lance in the
side. This is how the Father glorifies the Son. If there is any single point
clergy will struggle to communicate, or even to “get” themselves, it is this.
It’s not the rush to the empty tomb, it’s not the soaring or the shedding of
agony. It’s in the agony, it’s at the heart of the God-forsakenness where the
glory is glory.And so they overhear him praying. How puzzled, moved, confused and awed they must have been. Jesus prays to be glorified – which is what they desperately wanted for him (and for themselves!). But the glory, in John’s Gospel, isn’t a titanic win, some shining, towering victory.
There is no “illustration” of this for
preachers. The cross is the cross. “What language shall I borrow to thank thee,
dearest friend?” – as we rightly sing. The cross bears pondering, surveying,
lingering in its shadow. Jesus embraces this glory in advance, in anticipation.
What courage. What immense faith. What unbounded love for the very guys
standing around who are clueless even as they overhear him praying. What
unstinting mercy on us who live vapid, unintentional lives thoroughly enmeshed
in a culture that does not know or love the Lord Jesus.
Take special note in preaching of verse 3.
Jesus prays for them and us: “This is eternal life, that they know you, the
only true God, and Jesus whom you have sent.” Better rewind. Could this be?
Eternal life – isn’t it all the fun, acing every hole playing golf, festive
parties, reunions with lost loved ones, eating bonbons and not gaining an
ounce, basking in the brightness of heaven and the endless music of angelic
choirs? Eternal life isn’t God saying You get to keep on keeping on. It’s not
the infinite extension of the best life you’ve enjoyed thus far.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, in his genius of a commentary on Genesis, midrashes on Genesis 3 and points out that for the Bible's "great empires," Babylon and Egypt, we witness the remains of "the idea that one defeats mortality by building monuments that outlast the winds and sands of time. Judaism has a quite different idea, that we defeat mortality by engraving our ideals on the hearts of our children." Indeed, when Adam learned that Eve would bear children, "suddenly he knew that though we die, if we are privileged to have children, something of us will live on. That is our immortality."
Lovely. In John 17 we see something different, and (with all due respect to my Jewish friends) maybe better? Eternal life isn't a thing, or things, or a place in the way we think of places. It's not other people, although other people will be involved. It’s relationship - with God. Knowing God, being known by God.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, in his genius of a commentary on Genesis, midrashes on Genesis 3 and points out that for the Bible's "great empires," Babylon and Egypt, we witness the remains of "the idea that one defeats mortality by building monuments that outlast the winds and sands of time. Judaism has a quite different idea, that we defeat mortality by engraving our ideals on the hearts of our children." Indeed, when Adam learned that Eve would bear children, "suddenly he knew that though we die, if we are privileged to have children, something of us will live on. That is our immortality."
Lovely. In John 17 we see something different, and (with all due respect to my Jewish friends) maybe better? Eternal life isn't a thing, or things, or a place in the way we think of places. It's not other people, although other people will be involved. It’s relationship - with God. Knowing God, being known by God.
You came into being, just like the whole
universe, out of the creative and loving mind of God. God knew you into being.
God knew you in your mother’s womb (Psalm 139), and God knows you, and your
people right at this moment better than you’ll ever know yourselves. And
knowing so thoroughly, God loves and finds you to be beautiful. This knowing
isn’t facts and figures. It’s knowing, the way I know my infant daughter who
can’t tell me about herself, the way I know it’s time to rest, or I know I need
a hug, or I know I can’t live without my beloved, or I know I dream and yearn
and love and love some more. Eternal life is knowing Jesus, clearly, intimately.
Isn’t this related to 1 Corinthians 13,
which isn’t a poem Paul wrote so we’d have some pious words at weddings. It’s
about the love in the Body of Christ, and for the head of the Body. Realizing
we never know the other as clearly or deeply as we might wish, Paul says “Now
we see through a glass darkly. Then we will see face to face.” I’ll see God,
and not be blinded, although I will never see all of God. I’ll see myself, for
the first time, the full, unvarnished, marvelous truth about myself. And I’ll
see, I’ll know others, like I’ve never known even those I’ve known best.
Wouldn’t this be enough? and better than daily golf or bonbons?
If this is eternal life, and if we realize
this eternity in some measure now, then Jesus’ prayer that we may be one isn’t
far-fetched at all, is it?
****
Let me commend my new book, in the "Pastoring for Life: Theological Wisdom for Ministering Well" series: Birth: The Mystery of Being Born. I loved researching and writing this, and hope you'll enjoy. Glad to do a virtual signing of the frontispiece for you!
****
Let me commend my new book, in the "Pastoring for Life: Theological Wisdom for Ministering Well" series: Birth: The Mystery of Being Born. I loved researching and writing this, and hope you'll enjoy. Glad to do a virtual signing of the frontispiece for you!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.