While the Gospel seems to obvious choice a mere week after the resurrection, our Epistle is an eloquent reflection on why it matters. 1 Peter 1:3-9, surprisingly enough, chops off part of what is a ridiculously long single Greek sentence extending from v. 3 through v. 12! It’s as if the author – was it Peter, the rock, the denier, the commissioned one – was so exuberant that the words just kept spilling out. I wonder if I ever get so pumped up in preaching that an excess of words tumble over one another…
Some thoughts on special moments in his
ramble. To all Jesus Christ “Lord” seems sweetly pious to us. But in those
days, Caesar was Lord, so this claim undercuts all political allegiances and
requirements, and risked punishment for subversion. Who really is Lord?
Being “born anew” takes us back to Jesus’
reply to Nicodemus in John 3. My book on Birth comes out this month – and writing
it forced me to rethink everything on being “born again.” Often we think of it
as some kind of emotional intensity or spiritual high. But being born, as in
when you came out of the womb: a time of shocking transition from one world
(dark, warm, aquatic) to another (bright, cold, breathing required!). And it’s
all mercy. The Hebrew word for “womb,” rhm,
is the same as the word for mercy. And who needs mercy more than a newborn? I’ll
ramble around on this for a bit in my sermon, not saying “When you had a baby,”
as people will be there who haven’t or couldn’t; rather, “When you were a baby”…
God’s gift of new life is a radical transformation, and one we live into only
by radical dependence on the mercy.
The basis of this new birth? The crucifixion
and resurrection, sure – but really it’s the birth of Christ! He was born so we
might be reborn. Reminisce about Christmas, not the party/tinsel aspects, but
the holiness, the silent night, the humility of the manger, the joy of the
shepherds.
We are heirs – an image people can perhaps
envision – although it’s riches unimaginably vast. It is “kept,” the perfect
participle in Greek, implying the inheritance already exists in fact. Verse 6
reminds us how joy works: it is in the thick of suffering and trials or it’s
not really joy, is it? The verb “may” (you “may have to suffer”) feels good, as
it implies I probably won’t, but just in
case. The Greek, dei, implies far
more necessity. Your body may grow frail
as you age. You may feel intense sorrow when the one you love dies. May,
not probably not, but absolutely, it’s a thing.
It’s God’s faithfulness, not mine that
saves. The “genuineness” of faith isn’t a bulwark of belief in my heart or a
sturdiness of conviction in my head. It’s a being grasped by that faithfulness
that is God’s, not my own. This is “more precious than gold,” an echo of the
lovely Psalm 19, which sees the Torah as similarly priceless. The concluding
little section, which sorts through how we might love Christ although we’ve not
seen him, intrigues. I’ve not seen Christ.
Or have I? I’ve seen paintings and stained
glass. I’ve seen his actual Body, his Church, flawed as it may be. The miracle,
I wonder, isn’t that we believe in the Christ we’ve not seen as the guy who
came centuries ago, but rather the “rejoicing.” We’re sad,
go-through-the-motions, joyless Christians, not getting the joy, the sheer
delight in all this. Probably it’s because we are doers, we want to make
spirituality happen, we wish we were like dolphins who can swim at birth or
monkeys who actually use their arms to push out of mom’s womb. We are
dependent. We are weak, but he is strong – and that’s the joy!
On Peter’s believing and loving without
seeing, we find perhaps the first vivid instance of this in John 20:19-31 – a text with traces of
early church liturgy, right: They gather, a benediction is pronounced (“Peace
be with you”). To fearful people (not hard for the preacher to explore locks,
security systems, urban anxiety, even the proliferation of guns) Jesus comes
and speaks Peace into their fear. Fascinating how fearful our seemingly tough
people are, and just naming it? They know. Fear for personal safety. Fear
civilizationally: our huge moral and political debates are fear-driven. As
Walter Brueggemann divines things: all people fall into 2 categories, those who
fear the world they treasured is crumbling all around them, and those who fear
the world they dream of will never come to be. I have found in declaring this
that people, even if for a moment, find some common ground.
Notice Jesus doesn't criticize or judge them for their fears and doubts. He loves them. With his love he turns their confusion into friendship, their fear into trust.
His wounds are his love. Rachel Hollis, TV personality and author of Girl, Wash Your Face, posted an
Instagram photo of herself that went viral with this caption: “I have stretch
marks and I wear a bikini… because I’m proud of this body and every mark on it…
They aren’t scars, ladies, they’re stripes and you’ve earned them.” Earned
scars, earned through the enfleshing of love. I’m fond of the insight Graham
Greene shared in The End of the
Affair. A woman notices what used to be a wound on her lover’s
shoulder, and contemplates the advancing wrinkles in his face: “I thought of
lines life had put on his face, as personal as a line of writing – I thought of
a scar on his shoulder that wouldn’t have been there if once he hadn’t tried to
protect another man from a falling wall. The scar was part of his
character, and I knew I wanted that scar to exist through all eternity.”
The scars in Jesus’ hands
and side, earned when he gave life to all of us, were not blotted out by the
resurrection (John 20:27). Caravaggio painted it graphically. I love that Jesus shows up, not as powerful but as the wounded one. The wounds are his glory. What do we sing in "Crown Him with Many Crowns”? Behold his hands and side. Those wounds, yet
visible above, in beauty glorified.
Jesus breathes on them. Fascinating. Of
course we are to think of God’s breath giving life to the first humans (Genesis
2), and the reviving of the dead nation during the exile (Ezekiel 37). I like
to ponder that, for Jesus to breathe on them or anybody, they’ve got to be
standing close, right next to him. Is discipleship just sticking as close to
Jesus as possible, to feel his breath?
I’m wary of sermons that get fixated on “doubting”
Thomas. It’s a thing; I’m unsure if it helps parishoners if the clergy say “I
have doubts too!” At most I’d want to celebrate doubt, which isn’t a failure of
faith but asking darn good questions. Mark Helprin, in Winter’s Tale, writes “All great discoveries are products as much
of doubt as of certainty, and the two in opposition clear the air for marvelous
accidents.” Robert Penn Warren wonderfully said “Here, as in life, meaning is,
I should say, often more fruitfully found in the question asked than in any
answer given.. And then Simone Weil: “One can never wrestle enough with God if
one does so out of pure regard for the truth… Christ likes us to prefer truth
to him because, before being Christ, he is truth. If one turns aside from him
to go toward the truth, one will not go far before falling into his arms.”
My doubts are less about the existence of God or the resurrection of Christ, but rather about the possibility of forgiveness – which seems to be what this text is ultimately about, and what Easter in the Bible is entirely attentive to. Jesus is risen, so therefore – you are forgiven, and you go forgive. Startling. If I tell stories of forgiveness, the Amish at Nickel Mines, Pa., or Corrie ten Boom and her sister's executioner, will anyone believe?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.